l LOVE YOU SPRINGTIME. NOW … BUH-BYE
We concluded the first springtime post with the question: “Is there a downside to internalized springtime for the creative mind?”
So… is there?
Oh, you bet there is! I’ll give you an example:
Insurance agents (and I’m guessing it would be the same with all salesmen), are notorious for summarily ditching what works for them: a perfectly successful phone technique, a dynamic sales presentation, or flawless methods of turning nos into yeses. Suddenly, they just stop using them. Then, midway into their commission’s downward spiral, when their manager asks them why they stopped doing what was successful and made them money, most will sheepishly admit: “I knew that it worked, so I wanted to try something new.”
To try something new …. And, that, dear reader is the lure—the siren—of springtime!
Let me ask you this:
How many of you have amputated stories, or sheaves of half-worked melodies lying in the bottom of your desk drawers, or blocked out sketches on canvases stacked in our closets? How many of your past creative impregnations—after a rough winter’s labor—become pre-term-stillborn when challenged by springtime’s new shoots? To try something new.
Let me start the survey myself:
I have two unfinished novels and about eight or nine truncated short stories. No songs, I’m afraid. No canvases.
How about you painters reading this? Or songwriters? You other writers? 
Personally, I don’t know the first thing about technique in painting, only a little more about songwriting: I can hum a ditty. But I do know what all three have in common. Throw in playwriting and sculpting, and I’m still in familiar territory. And so are you!
I know they all began with an idea, which I’ll call a vision—however unarticulated the vision was.
If the vision was true there was a powerful, if not burning, desire to bring that idea or vision to completion. Dare I say it? I shall: To give birth … to the novel, or the short story, or the painting, sculpture, stained-glass window or architecture, or the song, tune, opera, or symphony!
Of course the all-important medium between Vision and Birth is Time.
Could it be simpler? If the vision produced a desire that was consistently powerful enough over time there would be a joyous delivery.
For the formula lovers amongst us, I offer:
VISION + SUSTAINED DESIRE + TIME (GESTATION) = BIRTH
* * *
The Challenge: Visit the graveyard of projects past. Let’s do a little disinterring.
For the purposes of discussion let’s say it’s a writing project you pulled out of the graveyard of your drawer.
1. The beginning-to-unravel point: At what point did you start losing interest in your project? You didn’t just one day say, “Okay, I’m no longer interested in this.” It came by degrees. And, there was a reason for it. Chances are the reason is going to take you right back to the vision.
I’m sitting here in my office chair, at my office desk, my hands cupped to the back of my head, elbows up and to the side, staring out the glass office door where the stenciled letters spelling AUTO, HOME, BUSINESS & LIFE INSURANCE are backwards to me so the passersby on the sidewalk heading down to the 7-11 can properly read it and perhaps come in and spoil my reverie while I am thinking, “Well … another springtime is here.”
I’m also imagining how someone, staring at me from one of the apartment windows in the complex across Columbus
Street, might wonder at my hands so placed behind my head, my elbows high and out, my well-toned lats filling that part of my Hawaiian shirt and at the glazed look in my eyes, whether I might, instead, be a huge Monarch butterfly fresh-slithered from my chrysalis, which he can’t see, owing to the distance and also the fact that my former springtime home lies like a discarded garment at my feet, hidden behind my big, impersonal insurance desk.
Oh, yes it is most definitely spring.
My imagination flutters me about the room, dipping and rising and soaring and fluttering, and the man in the apartment has now vacated his window falsely believing he had not been staring at a butterfly at all, but an old insurance man sitting in his chair behind his desk.
* * *
I’ve experienced probably sixty springtimes, nearly all of which I might remember the magic of, if I really put my mind to it. Even if I were to try to recapture the memory of the springtimes earlier than that, it would be irrelevant. Why? Because you don’t need springtime when all of childhood—assuming it is not meddled with—is tender and fresh. All life is magic, or should be, to the pre-teen child.
My reality is that I’m 73 years old. But, then again, no one who’s reading this is likely to be cavorting around in the tender, fresh wonder of childhood, either.
So, I’m thinking we all need our springtimes. Am I right? What does springtime conjure up in your mind? Spring cleaning? Or, Easter?
And, isn’t springtime the most popular season to marry? How about planting time? And, dare we omit nestlings chirping in the trees, or, butterflies flitting from flower to flower? What have I forgotten?
One doesn’t have to go too far to find the common thread running through all these? Springtime is a time of new beginnings.
At the risk of belaboring the obvious with the above statement, I’d like to take it a step further and suggest that the first day of spring should be the true New Year’s Day. Sure, a few things would have to be tweaked, but I’d wager that once done, the rational mind of man would have a closer association with the truth of new beginnings that reside in man’s soul. And, because of that … I’d wager another thing: our New Year’s resolutions would have a far better chance of succeeding because our souls are already geared toward change, improvement, betterment.
We’d have to do something about the college bowl games. I’ll put my people on it.
* * *
How do the seasons play out in our creative life? As a writer I wonder, is it just me, or do the fresh sprouts nudging the soil of our creative minds seem more abundant now? Notwithstanding, we may be still pregnant with undelivered projects of springs and summers past that we’ve been pushing through one more exhausting winter of fitful contractions.
No one said creative project-bearing would be easy!
And, now, as if to confound us, these new ideas are germinating in our minds with surprising ease and are as fresh as a peach-blossom-wafted breeze. With that tingling in our nostrils who could be blamed for wanting to take a break from all the pushing and grunting?
(Can I hear some of you complaining that the old coot is waxing awfully poetic? Well, you young whippersnappers, springtime’s the reason. Blame it on springtime!)
Complaints aside, though, are we beginning to see there just might be a downside to springtime for the creative mind I hope you’ll explore that with me next time.
Until then … be kind to old men and young butterflies.
Pssst! You made it this far so why not bounce clear to the top of the right-hand side bar and subscribe to my FREE newsletter? Until I get other people to voluntarily rave about it, I’m gonna have to be the first one you’ll read as saying: “Jay’s newsletter’s a hoot!” and “Chock-full of writing tips, it’s information rich, while entertaining and funny!” and “You’re gonna wanna jump aboard before Jay discovers how great it truly is and starts charging a huge subscription fee!”

THE HOW OF REJECTION
Over my Saturday morning treat of biscuits ‘n gravy and coffee at Carl’s Jr, I happened to be reading a short story by William Saroyan. The story is called Seventy Thousand Assyrians, and typical of Saroyan, it has a humongous title with very simple content that seems to go nowhere but goes everywhere, if you know what I mean.
He writes about a young man (the writer, William) needing a haircut; having little money, he goes to a barber college where he can get one for 15 cents. While he is waiting for his turn he strikes up a conversation with a sixteen-year-old lad, also down on his luck, and waiting for a haircut. The young man tells him he is heading to Portland, Oregon since there is no work in the lettuce fields of Salinas, which is in California. And, that brings me to Saroyan’s narrative. And, I quote:
“I wanted to tell him how it was with me: rejected story from Scribner’s, rejected essay from The Yale Review, no money for decent cigarettes, worn shoes, old shirts, but I was afraid to make something of my own troubles. A writer’s troubles are always boring, a bit unreal. People are apt to feel, Well, who asked you to write in the first place? A man must pretend not to be a writer. I said, ‘Good luck North.’”
A fine short story, worth every writer’s perusal. But, it was just the reading of that one paragraph that set me to thinking about the life of the writer then (1933) and now. And, it got me thinking philosophically about the writer then and now. About their psyches. About the subtle deeper layers, then and now. And, I’m way out of my own depth here, I know that. But has that ever stopped me before?
Thinking about it, and including it in my blog, are two different things, though. The decision maker was that my Kindle Fire alerted me I need to charge it now! I had just enough juice left to type out the above quote before the screen went gray.
The electronic age — how apt is that?
“I wanted to tell him how it was with me: rejected story from Scribner’s, rejected essay from The Yale Review.”
I’ll go back and pick up the rest of the quote later, but right now the keynote difference between the two parts of the quote is not the results of rejection but how one is rejected. And, the very important impact that time has on rejection. Very important!
Many writers are not old enough to have experienced the submission/rejection phase of which Saroyan speaks. I am, and some of you are. What Saroyan had to do was write, edit and put in its final polished form the manuscript he wanted to submit. He knew there was protocol. The editor, or his lackey, would be looking for a reason not to have to finish a piece to its end. There were hundreds that had to be waded through before closing time. The writer couldn’t fold it and slip it in a regular size envelope. Folding not allowed. So, he had to purchase manila envelopes. He needed two for each manuscript — one in which to put the Ms along with the second, folded, stamped manila envelope — alas! for the returned Ms. With the returned Ms would be the rejection slip, suitable for framing, wallpapering or wadding up. If Mr. Saroyan were fortunate there would be no coffee stains or other tale-tale signs on it, so he would be able to use the almost virgin Ms to send to the next on the list.
Each submission represented about a month out of the writer’s life. Thirty days. Maybe even longer. And, each successive, unsuccessful month meant a little more abrasion to his soul. But, I promised not to talk about the effects of rejection just now. Only the process, the how, of rejection.
Effort. Money. Time. These always have been and always will be the constants. How they are allocated will differ over the years.
Mr. Saroyan had a typewriter. While he created, he had to x-out the offending words, writing the corrected ones above or below the lines. But, for his finished Ms he needed perfection (back in an age without white-out or correcto-tape) and if that meant tossing an otherwise perfectly good page because in the last line he wrote to instead of too … so be it! Effort. Time.
Then came the computer age!
Just having the ability to make all the editing changes on the screen (with spell-check, insert and delete, cut and paste) before the Ms is printed, the computer presented an enormous saving in time and effort. And, then, with
the advent of the internet, all of a sudden Scribner’s, The Yale Review and a hundred-thousand other magazine and many book publishers have moved right next door. So to speak. There goes the neighborhood! — again, so to speak.
Now the writer whips his Ms into near perfection, pulls the publisher up on-line, pastes or attaches the Ms, pushes the submit button and, voila!, he is about ten days, instead of thirty from rejection — or acceptance, lets not forget that, with the payment sent to his Pay-pal account.
This first segment of “THEN AND NOW: (the Writer’s life)” focused on the submission/rejection process of Magazine Fiction and Non-fiction writing. For this blog, it is a stand-alone piece. I hope you enjoyed it. I also hope you will be inclined to sign up for my free newsletter where the series will continue with a close look at the results of rejection on the writer; after that, the third in the series will branch off to what I hope is a fresh exploration of brick ‘n mortar vs. E-book publication . You may sign up on the upper right sidebar. I hope you take that journey with me!
M’ bud, Seumas Gallacher , tossed me the gauntlet. wp.me/p2pTaK-rg He actually tossed five gauntlets to five receivers. I’m sure the other four caught theirs. Congrats, but I missed mine!
Steel gauntlet and big toe do not a merry meeting make.
But … not allowing a throbbing hallux to daunt this fisherman’s challenge, I cast the net of my memory out into the teeming sea of literature and snag my personal five favorite books.
These are the books whose special dog-eared pages can still tease out of me a smile or a tear after the third or thirtieth read. They might not be the critic’s choices. They may not be your favs. But dare you say they are not worthy of inclusion on Jay’s Doggone good Reads bookshelf, I want to cordially invite you to my boat. I have a dandy little plank I would like you to test out. Arrrrrrrrg!
So, here goes, dear readers. The selections are in no particular order. And, you writers out there … I reserve the right to revise the list after I’ve read your masterpieces. But, at this moment here are my choices:
A Child’s Christmas in Wales, By Dylan Thomas: This little book (I’ve seen it under its own covers, but it’s so small it’s usually included with his poems. But, it deserves its own sovereignty.) is meant to be read aloud—and in a Welch accent, I might add! Wanna know what a Welch accent sounds like? Listen to Dylan Thomas reading A Child’s Christmas in Wales. http://binged.it/ZbasXw If you’re like me, after to hear it you’re gonna want to have your own copy. Why? So you can read it aloud. Children especially love hearing it. I said Thomas’s words are meant to be read aloud. It’s truer to say they’re meant to be eaten! Like fine cuisine. Oh my! I’ve said it and it feels so good!
Fierce Invalids Home From Hot Climates, By Tom Robbins: In my opinion Robbins is a dangerous writer for a fledgling writer to read. Just sayin’. He breaks all the rules with his rendering of characters and plot and breaks them so seamlessly, so easily, so freely and with such astounding craftsmanship that an impressionable writer might easily come under his spell. I know I did! After reading this very book, I was a miniature Tom Robbins for my next 300,000, or so, words. I say “miniature” advisedly. I could never bring off the outrageous panache of the original. Mine was always a diluted, “miniature” version. But, to his favor, only greatness can bring about such an effect!
Look Homeward Angel, By Thomas Wolfe: I need to remind some of my readers that there are two Thomas Wolfe’s. There’s the one who wrote in the 50s, 60s and 70s. Then there’s the real Thomas Wolfe (he says with a wry smile). The author I’m speaking of was contemporaneous with Hemmingway. Anyway, I cut my newbie teeth on Thomas Wolfe. He was a literary steamroller. There is sheer power in his words and nowhere is that more representative than in Look Homeward Angel. I’ve heard it said that Wolfe will never be found in the Pantheon of American writers because they lack a certain “finished” quality … and I tend to agree with that assessment. But the emotional honesty and rawness that’s found in his prose is more a monument to me because of the lack of polish. Sometimes the excitement in one’s writing can only be spontaneous and polishing dulls its fine edge. And Besides, Wolfe stood over six-and-a-half feet tall and scrawled his mighty words on a tablet which was laid on top of the refrigerator. While apocryphal, it’s been said he used to beat his head against the wall to slow the pace of words that bubbled & frothed out of his brain. You just gotta love that!
Tropic of Cancer, By Henry Miller: Lawdy, how naughty I felt reading Tropic of Cancer in the 60s when it was declared to be “non-obscene” by the Supreme Court. I was about 20 at the time. Being “non-obscene” didn’t mean I wouldn’t be umbrella’d by a little old lady who watched me leering at the pages in the park, but at least I had no fear of being arrested. By today’s standards the book would raise nary an eyebrow. Both the Tropic books were important to me as a living document of life in the 30s and in Paris. Important literary and art figures wandered in and out of the pages—with their literary and artistic idiosyncrasies. Also, lest we forget, Henry Miller was not a shallow thinker. He helped bring sexuality out of the closet and cast it in an almost spiritual light.
The William Saroyan Reader, By William Saroyan: This is a compendium of some of William Saroyan’s best short stories along with a play, The Time of Your Life that won him the Pulitzer Prize. He declined the Prize because he believed that “commerce should not judge the arts.” I admire, so much, the integrity of the man behind the artist. William Saroyan (I think I’ll call him Bill) lived just up the street from me—well, 70 miles up the street, in Fresno, California, from which his stories derive their inspiration as well as their energy. Saroyan is sheer joy to read. His rambling yet organically controlled sentences, his down-to-earth characters who strike such a chord of reality, his settings that scintillate and drag you into the present moment—this is what makes Saroyan one of the most seminal writers in the twentieth century.
And, now, I’m going to wish the following five bloggers better luck than I in gauntlet catching. This is your assignment if you choose to take it (and, may I say you were chosen because of your high intelligence—to be sure—but also because you’ll do anything to take a day off your present project. Also, you dread with a dread the world’s never dreaded before of being invited to my boat.) When you’ve published your five favs make sure it includes at the bottom the five bloggers to whom you are going to toss your gauntlet, spear or grenade.
Without further ado, readers, put your gauntleted hands together for:
Clive Eaton http://www.cliveeaton.com/
Sonia Medeiros http://doingthewritething.wordpress.com/
John Betcher http://www.johnbetcher.com/index.html
Teresa Cypher http://dreamersloversandstarvoyagers.blogspot.com/
Hamilton C Burger http://hamiltoncburger.com/Hamilton_s_Blog.php
Pssst! You made it this far so why not pop over to the right-hand side bar and subscribe to my FREE newsletter? Until I get other people to voluntarily rave about it, I’m gonna have to be the first one you’ll read as saying: “Jay’s newsletter’s a hoot!” and “Chock-full of writing tips, it’s information rich, while entertaining and funny!” and “You’re gonna wanna jump aboard before Jay discovers how great it truly is and starts charging a huge subscription fee!”





